Developmental changes in straight gait in childhood.

BACKGROUND: Understanding typical gait development is critical in developing suitable physical therapy methods for gait disorders. This study investigated the developmental changes and controlling mechanisms of straight gait. METHODS: We conducted an experimental procedure among 90 participants, including 76 typically developing children and 14 healthy adults. The children were divided according to age into 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, and 9-10-year age groups. We created two indices to quantify straight gait using the extrapolated center of mass (XCOM; goal index, XCOMG and actual progress index, XCOMP), which were calculated and compared between the groups. Stepwise multiple regression was used to examine the effects of each gait variable on XCOMG and XCOMP. To eliminate the effects of multicollinearity, correlation coefficients were calculated for all gait variables. RESULTS: Both XCOMG and XCOMP decreased gradually with age and were significantly larger in the 3-4 and 5-6 year groups than in the adult group. Multiple regression analysis showed that step velocity, step width, and the coefficiente of variation (CV) of the step width had independent coefficients of variation for the XCOMG, and the symmetry index of step time, step width, and the CV of the step width had independent CV for the XCOMP. These variables were selected as significant variables. The results showed that meandering gait was more pronounced at younger ages. Furthermore, straight gait observed in adulthood was achieved by the age of 7. CONCLUSION: Pace (step velocity) and stability (step width and CV of step width) may contribute to XCOMG, which assesses the ability to proceed in the direction of the target. Stability and symmetry may contribute to XCOMP, which assesses the ability to walk straight in one's own direction of progress. Physical therapists could apply these indices in children to assess their ability to walk straight.

Development of the Relationships Among Dynamic Balance Control, Inter-limb Coordination, and Torso Coordination During Gait in Children Aged 3-10 Years.

Knowledge about the developmental process of dynamic balance control comprised of upper arms and upper legs coordination and trunk and pelvis twist coordination is important to advance effective balance assessment for abnormal development. However, the mechanisms of these coordination and stability control during gait in childhood are unknown.This study examined the development of dynamic postural stability, upper arm and upper leg coordination, and trunk and pelvic twist coordination during gait, and investigated the potential mechanisms integrating the central nervous system with inter-limb coordination and trunk and pelvic twist coordination to control extrapolated center of the body mass (XCOM). This study included 77 healthy children aged 3-10 years and 15 young adults. The child cohort was divided into four groups by age: 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, and 9-10 years. Participants walked barefoot at a self-selected walking speed along an 8 m walkway. A three-dimensional motion capture system was used for calculating the XCOM, the spatial margin of stability (MoS), and phase coupling movements of the upper arms, upper legs, trunk, and pelvic segments. MoS in the mediolateral axis was significantly higher in the young adults than in all children groups. Contralateral coordination (ipsilateral upper arm and contralateral upper leg combination) gradually changed to an in-phase pattern with increasing age until age 9 years. Significant correlations of XCOMML with contralateral coordination and with trunk and pelvic twist coordination (trunk/pelvis coordination) were found. Significant correlations between contralateral coordination and trunk/pelvis coordination were observed only in the 5-6 years and at 7-8 years groups.Dynamic postural stability during gait was not fully mature at age 10. XCOM control is associated with the development of contralateral coordination and trunk and pelvic twist coordination. The closer to in-phase pattern of contralateral upper limb coordination improved the XCOM fluctuations. Conversely, the out-of-phase pattern (about 90 degrees) of the trunk/pelvis coordination increased theXCOM fluctuation. Additionally, a different control strategy was used among children 3-8 years of age and individuals over 9 years of age, which suggests that 3-4-year-old children showed a disorderly coordination strategy between limb swing and torso movement, and in children 5-8 years of age, limb swing depended on trunk/pelvis coordination.

Development of temporal and spatial characteristics of anticipatory postural adjustments during gait initiation in children aged 3-10 years.

This study aimed to analyze the development of direction specificities of temporal and spatial control and the coordination pattern of anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) along the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions during gait initiation (GI) in children aged 3-10 years. This study included 72 healthy children aged 3-10 years and 14 young adults. The child population was divided into four groups by age: 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, and 9-10 years. The GI task included GI using the dominant limb. The peak center of feet pressure (COP) shifts during APAs (APApeak), initiation time of COP shifts (APAonset), and the COP vectors in the horizontal plane were calculated to evaluate the direction specificity of spatial, temporal, and coordination control, respectively. A difference in direction specificity development was found for the APApeak. The APApeak in the mediolateral axis, but not in the anteroposterior axis, was significantly higher in the 7-8 years age group than in other groups. Although APAonset was not found for direction specificity, a significant difference between the adult and children groups (5-6 years, 7-8 years, and 9-10 years) was observed in the direction of the COP vector. In conclusion, the developmental process of the spatial, temporal, and coordination control of APAs during GI varied with age. Furthermore, the spatial control and coordination pattern of APAs was found to be direction specific. All components of APAs, namely temporal and spatial control, coordination pattern, and direction specificities, should be analyzed to capture the developmental process of anticipatory postural control.

Development of postural control during single-leg standing in children aged 3-10 years.

BACKGROUND: The ability to control the center of mass (COM) during single-leg standing (SLS) is imperative for individuals to walk independently. However, detailed biomechanical features of postural control during SLS performed by children remain to be comprehensively investigated. RESEARCH QUESTION: We aimed to investigate the development of postural control during SLS in children aged 3-10 years. METHODS: Forty-eight healthy children (26 boys and 22 girls) aged 3-10 years and 11 young adults participated in this experiment. The child population was divided into four groups by age: 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, and 9-10 years. The SLS task included standing on a single leg as long and as steady as possible for up to 30 s. A three-dimensional motion capture system and two force plates were used for calculating the COM and center of pressure (COP). The task was divided into three phases (accelerated, decelerated, and steady) on the basis of the relationship between COM and COP. RESULTS: COP-COM distances in the 5-6 years' and 7-8 years' groups were significantly increased during the acceleration phase when compared with those in the adult group. Furthermore, COP-COM distances during the decelerated phase were significantly higher in all children's groups compared with those in the adult group. Lastly, COP-COM distance during the steady phase was significantly higher in the 3-4 year age group than in the 9-10 year age and adults groups. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that postural control during the acceleration and steady phases mature by 9 years. Conversely, children ∼10 years did not attain adult-like levels of postural control during the decelerated phase. The developmental process for postural control at each phase possibly plays a significant role in the basic biomechanics of movement and does not display a monotonic pattern.

Spontaneous movements of preterm infants is associated with outcome of gross motor development.

AIMS: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study to analyze the relationship between outcome of gross motor development in preterm infants and factors that might affect their development. METHODS: Preterm infants with a birth weight of <1500 g were recruited. We measured spontaneous antigravity limbs movements by 3D motion capture system at 3 months corrected age. Gross motor developmental outcomes at 6 and 12 months corrected age were evaluated using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Statistical analysis was carried out by canonical correlation analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen preterm infants were included. In the 6 months corrected age analysis, spontaneous movement had a major effect on Prone and Sitting at 6 months corrected age of AIMS. In the 12 months corrected age analysis, spontaneous movement had a major effect on Sitting and Standing at 12 months corrected age of AIMS. CONCLUSIONS: In preterm infants, better antigravity spontaneous movements at 3 months corrected age were significantly correlated with better gross motor development at 6 or 12 months corrected age.

Family-centered care for preterm infants: Parent and physical therapist perceptions.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare perceptions between physical therapists and parents about family-centered care for preterm infants. METHODS: Translated versions of the Measure of Processes of Care-20 and Measures of Processes of Care for Service Providers were used to evaluate the family-centered care for preterm infants. RESULTS: A total of 42 parents of 44 preterm infants and nine physical therapists completed questionnaires. Parent perceptions of the family-centered care were generally positive. The highest rating was in the domain Enable and Partnership. Physical therapists gave lower scores in all information domains. There were some gaps between parent and physical therapist perceptions of information domains. CONCLUSIONS: Strengths and weaknesses in family-centered care for preterm infants have been identified. Parents viewed the role of physical therapists in family-centered care for preterm infants as positive.

Characteristics of antigravity spontaneous movements in preterm infants up to 3 months of corrected age.

AIMS: We investigated whether spontaneous antigravity limbs movements in very low birth weight preterm infants were insufficient compared to those in term infants. The relationship between the quality of general movements (GMs) and antigravity limbs movements was also examined. METHODS: Preterm infants with very low birth weight without central nervous system disorders nor severe respiration disorders, and healthy term infants were recruited. The infants were set in a supine position. The distance between both hands and between both feet, and the height of both hands and feet from the floor were recorded at 1-3 corrected months for preterm infants, and at 1-3 months for term infants by a 3D motion capture system. The measurements were adjusted for body proportions. GMs in preterm and term infants were assessed similarly. RESULTS: Thirteen preterm and 15 term infants completed the study. In preterm infants, the distance between both hands and between both feet were longer, and the height of both hands and feet were lower than those in term infants in all measurements. In term infants, the height of both hands and feet increased as they developed, but no change was observed in preterm infants. In preterm infants with abnormal GMs, the distance between both hands was longer, and the height of both hands and feet was lower than that in those with normal GMs. There were no such differences between preterm infants with normal GMs and term infants with normal GMs. CONCLUSION: Antigravity limbs movements in preterm infants within the first 3 month of corrected age were insufficient compared with those in term infants. Furthermore, no improvement with development was observed in preterm infants. In addition, preterm infants with abnormal GMs showed worse antigravity limbs movements than preterm and term infants with normal GMs. The preterm infants with normal GMs could behave similar to the full term infants.